References
1.
Albury C, Pope C, Shaw S, Greenhalgh T,
Ziebland S, Martin S, et al. Gender in the consolidated
criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ)
checklist. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2021
Oct;33(4):mzab123.
3.
Allison R, Hayes C, McNulty CAM, Young V. A Comprehensive
Framework to Evaluate Websites: Literature
Review and Development of GoodWeb.
JMIR Formative Research. 2019 Oct;3(4):e14372.
4.
Altman DG. Better reporting of
randomised controlled trials: The CONSORT statement.
BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1996 Sep;313(7057):570–1.
5.
Altman DG, Simera I. A history of the
evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: The long road to
the EQUATOR Network. Journal of the Royal Society of
Medicine. 2016 Feb;109(2):67–77.
6.
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M,
Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The
Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized
Trials: Explanation and
Elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001
Apr;134(8):663–94.
7.
Alves B/O/OM. Global Index Medicus
[Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 19]. Available from: https://www.globalindexmedicus.net/
8.
Andrew E, Anis A, Chalmers T, Cho M, Clarke M,
Felson D, et al. A
Proposal for Structured Reporting of
Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA. 1994
Dec;272(24):1926–31.
9.
Anvari F, Lakens D. The replicability
crisis and public trust in psychological science. Comprehensive
Results in Social Psychology. 2018 Sep;3(3):266–86.
10.
Appelbaum M, Cooper H, Kline RB, Mayo-Wilson E,
Nezu AM, Rao SM. Journal
article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology:
The APA Publications and Communications Board
task force report. American Psychologist. 2018 Jan;73(1):3–25.
11.
ARRIVE Guidelines [Internet].
[cited 2024 May 5]. Available from: https://arriveguidelines.org/
12.
Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey
A, Ivers N, et al. A
guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of
behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.
Implementation Science. 2017 Jun;12(1):77.
13.
Bantry White E, Hurley M, Ó Súilleabháin F. The Journal
Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary,
Qualitative Meta-Analytic and Mixed Methods
Research: Applying the Standards to
Social Work Research. Journal of Evidence-Based Social
Work. 2019 Sep;16(5):469–77.
14.
Barnes C, Boutron I, Giraudeau B, Porcher R,
Altman DG, Ravaud P. Impact of an online
writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: The
COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool)
randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine. 2015 Sep;13(1):221.
15.
Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C,
Ferrat E, Roujeau JC, Richard MA, et al. Impact of
STROBE statement publication on quality of observational
study reporting: Interrupted time series versus before-after
analysis. PloS One. 2013;8(8):e64733.
16.
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D,
Olkin I, et al. Improving the
Quality of Reporting of Randomized
Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement. JAMA.
1996 Aug;276(8):637–9.
17.
Bierner M. Markdown Preview Mermaid
Support [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 13]. Available from: https://github.com/mjbvz/vscode-markdown-mermaid
18.
Boren T, Ramey J. Thinking aloud: Reconciling
theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional
Communication. 2000 Sep;43(3):261–78.
19.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA,
Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: An
updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy
studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct;351:h5527.
20.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA,
Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The
STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic
accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine.
2003 Jan;138(1):W1–12.
21.
Botos J. Reported use of
reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of
the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes,
and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of
presentation. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2018 Sep;3(1):7.
22.
Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a
Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care
Research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2017
Jan;4:2333393617742282.
23.
Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not
to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful
concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales.
Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2021
Mar;13(2):201–16.
24.
Brouwers MC, Kerkvliet K, Spithoff K,
Consortium ANS. The
AGREE Reporting Checklist: A tool to improve reporting of
clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016 Mar;352:i1152.
25.
Burford BJ, Welch V, Waters E, Tugwell P, Moher
D, O’Neill J, et al. Testing the
PRISMA-Equity 2012 reporting guideline: The perspectives of
systematic review authors. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e75122.
26.
Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the
theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and
implementation research. Implementation Science. 2012 Apr;7(1):37.
27.
Carp J. The secret lives
of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature. NeuroImage. 2012
Oct;63(1):289–300.
28.
Carvalho F. Participatory
design for behaviour change: An integrative approach to improving
healthcare practice focused on staff participation [Thesis].
Loughborough University; 2020.
29.
Case report writing simplified [Internet].
CARE-writer. [cited 2024 Mar 22]. Available from: https://care-writer.com
30.
CASP Qualitative Checklist
[Internet]. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. 2018 [cited 2022 May
5]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
31.
Caulley L, Cheng W, Catalá-López F, Whelan J,
Khoury M, Ferraro J, et al. Citation impact
was highly variable for reporting guidelines of health research: A
citation analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2020
Nov;127:96–104.
32.
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A,
Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT
2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol
Items for Clinical Trials. Annals of Internal
Medicine. 2013 Feb;158(3):200–7.
33.
Chen Y, Yang K, Marušić A, Qaseem A, Meerpohl
JJ, Flottorp S, et al. A
Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in
Health Care: The RIGHT Statement. Annals
of Internal Medicine. 2017 Jan;166(2):128–32.
34.
China National Knowledge
Infrastructure [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.cnki.net/
35.
Chinese Biomedical Literature
Database [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.imicams.ac.cn/
36.
Clough P. Narratives and Fictions
in Educational Research. Open University Press; 2002.
37.
Cobo E, Cortés J, Ribera JM, Cardellach F,
Selva-O’Callaghan A, Kostov B, et al. Effect of using reporting
guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted
to a biomedical journal: Masked randomised trial. BMJ. 2011
Nov;343:d6783.
38.
Cobo E, Selva-O’Callagham A, Ribera JM,
Cardellach F, Dominguez R, Vilardell M. Statistical
Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical
Articles: A Randomized Trial. PLoS ONE. 2007
Mar;2(3):e332.
39.
40.
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting
of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or
diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
BMC Medicine. 2015 Jan;13(1):1.
41.
Compliance Questionnaire
ARRIVE Guidelines [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct
24]. Available from: https://arriveguidelines.org/resources/compliance-questionnaire
42.
Covid-19: Response and
Excess Deaths - Hansard - UK
Parliament [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 10]. Available from:
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2024-04-18/debates/9F01F787-D758-43D4-B8D1-4FA357EB3EED/Covid-19ResponseAndExcessDeaths
43.
Craven J, Nietzio A. A task-based approach
to assessing the accessibility of web sites. Performance Measurement
and Metrics. 2007 Jan;8(2):98–109.
44.
Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G,
Mooney SE. Publication
guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: Evolution of
the SQUIRE project. BMJ. 2009 Jan;338:a3152.
45.
Davidson SRE, Kamper SJ, Haskins R, Robson E,
Gleadhill C, da Silva PV, et al. Exercise
interventions for low back pain are poorly reported: A systematic
review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021 Nov;139:279–86.
46.
Davies L, Donnelly KZ, Goodman DJ, Ogrinc G. Findings from a novel
approach to publication guideline revision: User road testing of a draft
version of SQUIRE 2.0. BMJ quality & safety. 2016
Apr;25(4):265–72.
47.
Davies L, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D,
Ogrinc G. The
SQUIRE Guidelines: An evaluation from the field, 5years
post release. BMJ quality & safety. 2015 Dec;24(12):769–75.
48.
Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Atal I, Moher D,
Dickersin K, Boutron I, et al. Evolution of poor reporting and
inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials
included in Cochrane reviews: Research on research
study. BMJ. 2017 Jun;357:j2490.
49.
de
Jong M, Schellens PJ. Toward
a document evaluation methodology: What does research tell us about the
validity and reliability of evaluation methods? IEEE Transactions on
Professional Communication. 2000 Sep;43(3):242–60.
50.
de
Jong Y, van der Willik EM, Milders J, Voorend CGN, Morton RL, Dekker FW,
et al. A
meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative
reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest
uptake. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2021 Sep;21(1):184.
51.
De
Jong M, Schellens PJ. Reader-Focused
Text Evaluation: An Overview of Goals
and Methods. Journal of Business and Technical
Communication. 1997 Oct;11(4):402–32.
52.
Developing and wording guideline
recommendations The guidelines manual
Guidance NICE
[Internet]. NICE; 2012 [cited 2024 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg6/chapter/developing-and-wording-guideline-recommendations#wording-the-guideline-recommendations
53.
de
Vries RBM, Hooijmans CR, Langendam MW, van Luijk J, Leenaars M,
Ritskes-Hoitinga M, et al. A
protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of
systematic reviews of animal intervention studies. Evidence-based
Preclinical Medicine. 2015;2(1):e00007.
54.
Dewey M, Levine D, Bossuyt PM, Kressel HY. Impact and perceived
value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology
authors and reviewers. European Radiology. 2019 Aug;29(8):3986–95.
55.
Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Vlaev
I. MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour for public policy
[Internet]. Institute of Government; 2010 [cited 2024 Oct 11]. Available
from: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf
56.
Download Free Vectors,
Images, Stock Photos & Stock
Videos [Internet]. Vecteezy. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from:
https://www.vecteezy.com/
57.
Ecommerce Foundation. Ecommerce Benchmark
Retail Report 2016 [Internet]. Ecommerce Europe. [cited 2023 Aug
2]. Available from: https://www.ecommerce-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Ecommerce-Benchmark-Retail-Report-2016.pdf
58.
The
EQUATOR Network Enhancing the
QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research
[Internet]. [cited 2020 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/
59.
Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol
Analysis: Verbal Reports as
Data. The MIT Press; 1993.
60.
Errington TM, Denis A, Perfito N, Iorns E,
Nosek BA. Challenges for
assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. Rodgers P,
Franco E, editors. eLife. 2021 Dec;10:e67995.
61.
ESRC to radically expand
UK behavioural research capacity [Internet]. 2023 [cited
2024 Jan 17]. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/news/esrc-to-radically-expand-uk-behavioural-research-capacity/
62.
Eysenbach G. CONSORT-EHEALTH:
Implementation of a checklist for authors and editors to improve
reporting of web-based and mobile randomized controlled trials.
Studies in health technology and informatics. 2013;192:657–61.
63.
Fang Z.-P., Leng X., Liu Y.-L., Liu W.-B., Hu
W.-J., Zhang Z.-J., et al. A survey on
awareness of the ARRIVE guideline and GSPC in researchers field in
animal experiments field in Lanzhou city. Chinese Journal of
Evidence-Based Medicine. 2015;15(7):797–801.
64.
Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics.
XXV. A survey of the statistical procedures in
general medical journals. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
1974 Jan;15(1):97–107.
65.
Fishbein M, Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, Becker M,
Middlestadt SE, Eichler A, et al. Factors influencing behavior and
behavior change. Handbook of health psychology. 2001;3(1):3–17.
66.
Free Icons and
Stickers - Millions of images to download
[Internet]. Flaticon. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.flaticon.com/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flaticon.com%2F
67.
Freepik: Download Free Videos,
Vectors, Photos, and PSD
[Internet]. Freepik. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.freepik.com
68.
Fuller T, Pearson M, Peters J, Anderson R. What affects
authors’ and editors’ use of reporting guidelines? Findings
from an online survey and qualitative interviews. PLoS ONE. 2015
Jan;10(4):e0121585.
69.
[GA4] Automatically
collected events - Firebase Help [Internet]. [cited 2023
Jul 31]. Available from: https://support.google.com/firebase/answer/9234069?sjid=11808073354477924035-EU&visit_id=638263997154270219-1141820337&rd=1
70.
[GA4] Predefined user
dimensions - Firebase Help [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 31].
Available from: https://support.google.com/firebase/answer/9268042?sjid=11808073354477924035-EU&visit_id=638263997154270219-1141820337&rd=1
71.
Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox
H, Riley D, et al. The
CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting
guideline development. Case Reports. 2013 Oct;2013:bcr2013201554.
72.
Garnett C, Crane D, West R, Brown J, Michie S.
The development of
Drink Less: An alcohol reduction smartphone app for
excessive drinkers. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2019
Mar;9(2):296–307.
73.
Garnett C, Perski O, Michie S, West R, Field M,
Kaner E, et al. Refining the
content and design of an alcohol reduction app, Drink
Less, to improve its usability and effectiveness: A mixed
methods approach. F1000Research; 2021.
74.
Gi̇ray E, Coskun OK, Karacaatli M, Gunduz OH,
Yagci İ. Assessment of
the knowledge and awareness of a sample of young researcher physicians
on reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR network:
A single center cross-sectional study. Marmara Medical
Journal. 2020 Jan;33(1):1–6.
75.
GitHub Pages [Internet]. [cited
2023 Aug 4]. Available from: https://pages.github.com/
76.
Given L. Focus
Groups. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of
Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE
Publications, Inc.; 2008. p. 353–4.
77.
Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I,
Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from
incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet
(London, England). 2014 Jan;383(9913):267–76.
78.
Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from
descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ. 2008
Jun;336(7659):1472–4.
79.
Glick BS. Inadequacies in the reporting
of clinical drug research. The Psychiatric Quarterly. 1963
Apr;37:234–44.
80.
Goldacre B. Bad pharma: How drug
companies mislead doctors and harm patients. Fourth Estate; 2012.
81.
GoodReports.org [Internet]. [cited
2020 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.goodreports.org
82.
Google Analytics [Internet].
Google Marketing Platform. [cited 2023 Jul 31]. Available from: https://marketingplatform.google.com/intl/en_uk/about/analytics/
83.
Google Search Console [Internet].
[cited 2024 May 5]. Available from: https://search.google.com/search-console/about
84.
Guo
S, Qi S, Yang L, Wang X, Zhu Q, Meng X, et al. Recognition status of
quality assessment and standards for reporting randomized controlled
trials of traditional Chinese medicine researchers. China
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy [Internet]. 2018
[cited 2022 Jun 20];(3):1077–81. Available from: https://caod.oriprobe.com/articles/53258508/Recognition_status_of_quality_assessment_and_stand.htm
85.
Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness
LA. PRISMA2020:
An R package and Shiny app for producing
PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for
optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.
Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2022;18(2):e1230.
86.
Hair K, Macleod MR, Sena ES, Sena ES, Hair K,
Macleod MR, et al. A
randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to
Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines
(IICARus). Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2019
Jun;4(1):12.
87.
Hawwash D, Sharp MK, Argaw A, Kolsteren P,
Lachat C. Usefulness of
applying research reporting guidelines as Writing Aid
software: A crossover randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019
Nov;9(11).
88.
Haynes A, Loblay V. Rethinking
Barriers and Enablers in Qualitative
Health Research: Limitations,
Alternatives, and Enhancements.
Qualitative Health Research. 2024 Mar;10497323241230890.
89.
Health and Medical Articles
Database - African Index Medicus [Internet]. [cited
2021 Mar 1]. Available from: https://indexmedicus.afro.who.int/
90.
Hopewell S, Ravaud P, Baron G, Boutron I. Effect of editors’
implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of
abstracts in high impact medical journals: Interrupted time series
analysis. BMJ. 2012 Jun;344:e4178.
91.
Hopewell S, Boutron I, Altman DG, Barbour G,
Moher D, Montori V, et al. Impact of a web-based
tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised
trials: Results of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Medicine. 2016
Nov;14(1):199.
92.
Hopewell S, Boutron I, Chan AW, Collins GS, de
Beyer JA, Hróbjartsson A, et al. An update to
SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to
enhance transparency in randomized trials. Nature Medicine. 2022
Sep;28(9):1740–3.
93.
Howell V, Schwartz AE, O’Leary JD, Donnell CM.
The effect of the
SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement
Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the
quality improvement literature: A before-and-after study. BMJ
Quality & Safety. 2015 Jun;24(6):400–6.
94.
https://www.skillzone.net SZL. Definition:
Paired depth interview [Internet]. Association for
Qualitative Research (AQR). [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.aqr.org.uk/glossary/paired-depth-interview
95.
https://www.skillzone.net SZL. Definition:
Triad [Internet]. Association for Qualitative Research
(AQR). [cited 2024 May 20]. Available from: https://www.aqr.org.uk/glossary/triad
96.
Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C,
Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health
Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)
statement. BMC Medicine. 2013 Mar;11(1):80.
97.
Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, de
Bekker-Grob E, Briggs AH, Carswell C, et al. Consolidated
Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022
(CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for
health economic evaluations. BMC Medicine. 2022 Jan;20(1):23.
98.
Hypothes.is [Internet]. Hypothesis. [cited 2024
May 5]. Available from: https://web.hypothes.is/
99.
ICMJE
Recommendations Preparing a
Manuscript for Submission to a Medical
Journal [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 8]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation/preparing-for-submission.html#two
100.
101.
Ioannidis JPA. Why Most
Published Research Findings Are False. PLOS Medicine. 2005
Aug;2(8):e124.
102.
ISO 9241-210:2019(en),
Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part
210: Human-centred design for interactive
systems [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 6]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-2:v1:en
103.
ISO - International
Organization for Standardization [Internet]. ISO.
2023 [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/home.html
104.
Harwood J. EQUATOR Guidelines Website
Repository [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 4]. Available from:
https://github.com/jamesrharwood/equator-guidelines-website
105.
Jin Y, Sanger N, Shams I, Luo C, Shahid H, Li
G, et al. Does the
medical literature remain inadequately described despite having
reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of
reviews: An update. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2018
Sep;11:495–510.
106.
JISC. Online surveys [Internet]. [cited 2024
May 21]. Available from: https://www.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/
107.
Kapp P, Esmail L, Ghosn L, Ravaud P, Boutron I.
Transparency and
reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled
trials. BMC Medicine. 2022 Sep;20(1):363.
108.
Karadağ Öncel E, Başaranoğlu ST, Aykaç K,
Kömürlüoğlu A, Akman AÖ, Kıran S. Knowledge and
awareness of optimal use of reporting guidelines in paediatricians:
A cross-sectional study. Turk Pediatri Arsivi. 2018
Sep;53(3):163–8.
109.
Kilicoglu H, Jiang L, Hoang L, Mayo-Wilson E,
Vinkers CH, Otte WM. Methodology
reporting improved over time in 176,469 randomized controlled
trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2023 Aug;
110.
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M,
Altman DG. Improving
Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE
Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLOS
Biology. 2010 Jun;8(6):e1000412.
111.
Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. Characteristics of
Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic
Review. Research in nursing & health. 2017
Feb;40(1):23–42.
112.
Koch M, Riss P, Umek W, Hanzal E. The explicit mentioning of
reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A
bibliometric study. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2016
Mar;35(3):412–6.
113.
Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE,
Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, et al. Updating standards for
reporting diagnostic accuracy: The development of STARD
2015. Research integrity and peer review. 2016;1(101676020):7.
114.
L.Morgan D. Focus Groups
as Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1997.
115.
The largest icon set in the world. [Internet].
Smashicons. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: http://www.smashicons.com/
116.
Acquiescence
Response Bias. In: Encyclopedia of Survey
Research Methods. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand
Oaks California 91320 United States of America: Sage Publications, Inc.;
2008.
117.
Learn how to write and publish case reports
[Internet]. Scientific Writing in Health and Medicine. [cited 2024 Mar
22]. Available from: https://www.swihm.com/course
118.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C,
Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA
statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies
that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration.
BMJ. 2009 Jul;339:b2700.
119.
Liberati A. An unfinished trip
through uncertainties. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 2004
Feb;328(7438):531.
120.
LILACS [Internet]. Latin America
and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature. [cited 2021 Feb 19]. Available
from: https://lilacs.bvsalud.org/en/
121.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic
Inquiry. SAGE; 1985.
122.
M.Given L. Constructivism. In: The
SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research
Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. p. 116–20.
123.
Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U,
Chalmers I, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Biomedical
research: Increasing value, reducing waste. The Lancet. 2014
Jan;383(9912):101–4.
124.
Macleod M, Collings AM, Graf C, Kiermer V,
Mellor D, Swaminathan S, et al. The MDAR
(Materials Design Analysis Reporting)
Framework for transparent reporting in the life
sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021
Apr;118(17):e2103238118.
125.
Magaldi D, Berler M. Semi-structured
Interviews. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK,
editors. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual
Differences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p.
4825–30.
126.
Malterud K. Qualitative
research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet (London,
England). 2001 Aug;358(9280):483–8.
127.
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample Size
in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by
Information Power. Qualitative Health Research. 2016
Nov;26(13):1753–60.
128.
Ma
B, Xu J, Wu W, Liu H, Kou C, Liu N, et al. Survey of basic
medical researchers on the awareness of animal experimental designs and
reporting standards in China. PLoS ONE. 2017
Apr;12(4):e0174530.
129.
McDonough J., O’Dunne A., B. C, Margerum B.,
Sutton D. Familiarity of non-industry authors with good publication
practice and clinical data reporting guidelines. Current Medical
Research and Opinion. 2011;27:S9.
130.
McGrath C, Palmgren PJ, Liljedahl M. Twelve tips for
conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher. 2019
Sep;41(9):1002–6.
131.
medRxiv.org - the
preprint server for Health Sciences [Internet]. [cited 2023
Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/
132.
Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C,
Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change
technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques:
Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change
interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the
Society of Behavioral Medicine. 2013 Aug;46(1):81–95.
133.
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change
wheel: A new method for characterising and designing
behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011
Apr;6(1):42.
134.
Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The Behaviour
Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing
Interventions [Internet]. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
Available from: www.behaviourchangewheel.com
135.
Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R,
Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological
theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus
approach. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2005 Feb;14(1):26–33.
136.
Mills T, Lawton R, Sheard L. Advancing complexity
science in healthcare research: The logic of logic models. BMC
Medical Research Methodology. 2019 Mar;19(1):55.
137.
Moher D, Weeks L, Ocampo M, Seely D, Sampson M,
Altman DG, et al. Describing
reporting guidelines for health research: A systematic review.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;64(7):718–42.
138.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for
developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLOS Medicine.
2010 Feb;7(2):e1000217.
139.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D,
Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items
for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols
(PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015
Jan;4(1):1.
140.
Mook DG. Motivation : The organization of
action [Internet]. W.W. Norton; 1996 [cited 2023 Jul 14]. Available
from: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282269635015808
141.
Nedovic D, Panic N, Pastorino R, Ricciardi W,
Boccia S. Evaluation of
the Endorsement of the STrengthening the
REporting of Genetic Association Studies
(STREGA) Statement on the Reporting
Quality of Published Genetic Association
Studies. Journal of Epidemiology. 2016 Aug;26(8):399–404.
142.
The NHS website [Internet]. 16 Aug
2018, 12:27 a.m. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/
143.
NICE The
National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence [Internet]. NICE. NICE; [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available
from: https://www.nice.org.uk/
144.
Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the
finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the
INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93
Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery;
1993. p. 206–13. (CHI ’93).
145.
Nielsen Norman Group: UX
Training, Consulting, & Research
[Internet]. Nielsen Norman Group. [cited 2023 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/
146.
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA,
Cook DA. Standards for
Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of
Recommendations. Academic Medicine. 2014
Sep;89(9):1245–51.
147.
Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P,
Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0
(Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting
Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed
consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016 Dec;25(12):986–92.
148.
O’Reilly M, Parker N. “Unsatisfactory
Saturation”: A critical exploration of the notion of
saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative
Research. 2013 Apr;13(2):190–7.
149.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I,
Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020
statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021 Mar;372:n71.
150.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I,
Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. Updating guidance
for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA
2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021
Jun;134:103–12.
151.
Pandis N, Shamseer L, Kokich VG, Fleming PS,
Moher D. Active
implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental
specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014 Sep;67(9):1044–8.
152.
Parrillo V. Groupthink. In:
Encyclopedia of Social Problems. Thousand Oaks: SAGE
Publications, Inc.; 2008. p. 421–1.
153.
Pastel Fastest
visual website feedback tool for web designers, developers and agencies
[Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://usepastel.com/
154.
Paul Doncaster. The UX
Five-Second Rules. In: The UX Five-Second Rules:
Guidelines for User Experience Design’s
Simplest Testing Technique. Morgan Kaufmann; 2014. p.
19–76.
155.
Pelly M, Fatehi F, Liew D, Verdejo-Garcia A. Novel behaviour change
frameworks for digital health interventions: A critical
review. Journal of Health Psychology. 2023 Sep;28(10):970–83.
156.
Penelope.ai automated manuscript checker
[Internet]. Penelope.ai. [cited 2020 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.penelope.ai
157.
Percie du Sert N, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT,
Baker M, Browne WJ, et al. Reporting animal
research: Explanation and elaboration for the
ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS biology.
2020;18(7):e3000411.
158.
Personas Health Education
England [Internet]. Health Education England
Digital Transformation. [cited 2023 Oct 6]. Available from: https://digital-transformation.hee.nhs.uk/building-a-digital-workforce/dart-ed/horizon-scanning/ai-and-digital-healthcare-technologies/applying-the-framework-and-next-steps/personas
159.
Personas Make Users Memorable for
Product Team Members [Internet]. Nielsen Norman Group.
[cited 2023 Oct 6]. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/persona/
160.
Phillips A., Lewis L.K., McEvoy M.P., Galipeau
J., Glasziou P., Moher D., et al. Pilot testing of
the guideline for reporting of evidence-based practice educational
interventions and teaching (greet). Physiotherapy (United Kingdom).
2015;101:eS1203–4.
161.
Popup Builder That Boosts Sales.
[Internet]. Popup Smart. [cited 2023 Jul 31]. Available from: https://popupsmart.com/
162.
Pourrazavi S, Fathifar Z, Sharma M,
Allahverdipour H. COVID-19
vaccine hesitancy: A Systematic review of cognitive
determinants. Health Promotion Perspectives. 2023 Apr;13(1):21–35.
163.
Pouwels KB, Widyakusuma NN, Groenwold RHH, Hak
E. Quality of
reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after
the STROBE guideline. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
2016 Jan;69:217–24.
164.
Prady SL, MacPherson H. Assessing the utility of
the standards for reporting trials of acupuncture
(STRICTA): A survey of authors. The
Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2007
Nov;13(9):939–43.
165.
Prager R, Gagnon L, Bowdridge J, Unni RR,
McGrath TA, Cobey K, et al. Barriers to reporting
guideline adherence in point-of-care ultrasound research: A
cross-sectional survey of authors and journal editors. BMJ
Evidence-Based Medicine. 2021 Jan;bmjebm-2020-111604.
166.
Projet MiRoR [Internet]. Projet
MiRoR. [cited 2021 Feb 6]. Available from: http://miror-ejd.eu/
167.
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo
[Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
168.
Quarto: An open source technical
publishing system for creating beautiful articles, websites, blogs,
books, slides, and more. Supports Python, R,
Julia, and JavaScript. [Internet]. Quarto.
[cited 2023 Aug 4]. Available from: https://quarto.org/
169.
Rachael Cayley. Explorations of
Style [Internet]. A Blog about Academic Writing. [cited
2024 Mar 21]. Available from: https://explorationsofstyle.com/
170.
Rader T., Mann M., Stansfield C., Cooper C.,
Sampson M. Methods for
documenting systematic review searches: A discussion of common
issues. Research synthesis methods. 2014;5(2):98–115.
171.
Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S,
Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, et al. PRISMA-S:
An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting
literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2021
Jan;10(1):39.
172.
Rogers M, Bethel A, Abbott R. Locating qualitative studies in
dementia on MEDLINE, EMBASE,
CINAHL, and PsycINFO: A
comparison of search strategies. Research Synthesis Methods.
2018;9(4):579–86.
173.
Rosumeck S, Wagner M, Wallraf S, Euler U. A validation study
revealed differences in design and performance of search filters for
qualitative research in PsycINFO and
CINAHL. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:101–8.
174.
The RStudio Integrated Development
Environment (IDE) is the preferred tools for data
scientists who develop in R & Python.
[Internet]. Posit. [cited 2023 Aug 4]. Available from: https://posit.co/products/open-source/rstudio/
175.
S.Lewis-Beck M, Bryman A, Liao TF. Social Desirability
Bias. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social
Science Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2004.
176.
Santo TD, Rice DB, Amiri LSN, Tasleem A, Li K,
Boruff JT, et al. Methods and
results of studies on reporting guideline adherence are poorly reported:
A meta-research study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2023
Jul;159:225–34.
177.
Savović J, Turner RM, Mawdsley D, Jones HE,
Beynon R, Higgins JPT, et al. Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and
Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane
Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study.
American Journal of Epidemiology. 2018 May;187(5):1113–22.
178.
Schlussel MM, Sharp MK, de Beyer JA, Kirtley S,
Logullo P, Dhiman P, et al. Reporting
guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2023 Jul;159:246–56.
179.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, the CONSORT
Group. CONSORT 2010
Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group
randomised trials. BMC Medicine. 2010 Mar;8(1):18.
180.
SciELO [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb
19]. Available from: https://scielo.org/en/about-scielo
181.
Scimago Journal &
Country Rank [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 6]. Available
from: https://www.scimagojr.com/
182.
Sert NP du, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey
MT, Baker M, et al. The
ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for
reporting animal research. PLOS Biology. 2020 Jul;18(7):e3000410.
183.
Sharp MK, Tokalić R, Gómez G, Wager E, Altman
DG, Hren D. A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal
journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions.
Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2019;107:42–50.
184.
Sharp MK, Glonti K, Hren D. Online survey
about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views
about its content, purpose, and value. Journal of clinical
epidemiology. 2020;123:100–6.
185.
Sharp MK, Bertizzolo L, Rius R, Wager E, Gómez
G, Hren D. Using the
STROBE statement: Survey findings emphasized the role of
journals in enforcing reporting guidelines. Journal of Clinical
Epidemiology. 2019 Dec;116:26–35.
186.
SinoMed [Internet]. [cited 2021
Mar 5]. Available from: http://www.sinomed.ac.cn/
187.
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P,
Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing
and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research
Council guidance. BMJ. 2021 Sep;n2061.
188.
STM Association. STM Global Brief
2021 – Economics & Market Size [Internet].
[cited 2023 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.stm-assoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022_08_24_STM_White_Report_a4_v15.pdf
189.
Struthers C, Harwood J, de Beyer JA, Dhiman P,
Logullo P, Schlüssel M. GoodReports:
Developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting
guidelines. BMC medical research methodology. 2021 Oct;21(1):217.
190.
Svensøy JN, Nilsson H, Rimstad R. A qualitative study on
researchers’ experiences after publishing scientific reports on major
incidents, mass-casualty incidents, and disasters. Prehospital and
Disaster Medicine. 2021 Oct;36(5):536–42.
191.
Sword H. Stylish Academic Writing
[Internet]. Harvard University Press; 2012 [cited 2024 Mar 21].
Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbw8b
192.
Szinay D, Perski O, Jones A, Chadborn T, Brown
J, Naughton F. Influences on the
Uptake of Health and Well-being Apps and Curated App
Portals: Think-Aloud and Interview
Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2021 Apr;9(4):e27173.
193.
Tam WWS, Tang A, Woo B, Goh SYS. Perception of the
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)
statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: A
cross-sectional online survey. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr;9(4):e026271.
194.
Taylor S, Asmundson GJG. Negative attitudes
about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic:
The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and
psychological reactance. PLoS ONE. 2021 Feb;16(2):e0246317.
195.
Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic
synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical
Research Methodology. 2008 Jul;8(1):45.
196.
TIDieR
Author tool [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 20]. Available
from: https://tidierguide.org/#/author-tool
197.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for
reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist
for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality
in Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349–57.
198.
Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig
J. Enhancing
transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research:
ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012
Nov;12(1):181.
199.
Topor M, Pickering JS, Mendes AB, Bishop DVM,
Büttner F, Elsherif MM, et al. An integrative framework
for planning and conducting Non-Intervention,
Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews
(NIRO-SR). Meta-Psychology. 2023 Jul;7.
200.
Usage Statistics and Market
Share of Traffic Analysis Tools for
Websites, July 2023 [Internet]. [cited 2023
Jul 31]. Available from: https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/traffic_analysis
201.
Velsen LS van, Gemert-Pijnen JEWC van, Nijland
N, Beaujean D, Steenbergen J van. Personas: The Linking Pin
in Holistic Design for eHealth.
In: eTELEMED 2012 : The Fourth
International Conference on eHealth,
Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. 2012. p.
128–33.
202.
VIP Chinese Medical Journal
Database [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.cqvip.com/
203.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ,
Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the
reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE)
statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ :
British Medical Journal. 2007 Oct;335(7624):806–8.
204.
W.Stewart D, N.Shamdasani P, W.Rook D. Focus
Groups. SAGE Publications, Ltd.; 2007.
205.
Wallach D, Scholz SC. User-Centered
Design: Why and How to Put Users
First in Software Development. In: Maedche A,
Botzenhardt A, Neer L, editors. Software for People:
Fundamentals, Trends and Best
Practices. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 11–38.
206.
Wanfang Data - A Leading
Provider of Electronic Resources for China
Studies [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.wanfangdata.com/
207.
Web & Mobile Tag Management
Solutions – Google Tag Manager [Internet]. Google
Marketing Platform. [cited 2023 Jul 31]. Available from: https://marketingplatform.google.com/intl/en_uk/about/tag-manager/
208.
Website Builder —
Create a Website in Minutes
[Internet]. Squarespace. [cited 2023 Aug 4]. Available from: https://www.squarespace.com/
209.
Western Pacific Region Index
Medicus [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.wprim.org/
210.
WHO EMRO
IMEMR Library [Internet]. [cited
2021 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/e-library/imemr/index.html
211.
Wilkinson S. The role of
reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International
Forum. 1988 Jan;11(5):493–502.
212.
Woolgar S, editor. Knowledge and reflexivity:
New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. Thousand Oaks,
CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc; 1988.
213.
Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting
of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature. Call for
comments on a proposal to improve reporting of clinical trials in the
biomedical literature. Working Group on
Recommendations for Reporting of
Clinical Trials in the Biomedical
Literature. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994
Dec;121(11):894–5.
214.
Yardley L, Morrison L, Bradbury K, Muller I. The Person-Based
Approach to Intervention Development:
Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change
Interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015
Jan;17(1):e4055.
215.
Yardley L, Morrison LG, Andreou P, Joseph J,
Little P. Understanding reactions
to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: Accommodating user
preferences for information provision. BMC Medical Informatics and
Decision Making. 2010 Sep;10(1):52.
216.
Yilmaz S, Çolak FÜ, Hökenek NM, Ak R. Hesitancy Regarding
Medical Advice on COVID-19: An Emergency
Department Perspective. Disaster Medicine and Public Health
Preparedness. :1–11.
217.
Your website, your business, your
future｜Wix.com [Internet]. wix.com. [cited 2023 Aug 4].
Available from: https://www.wix.com
218.
Ziemann S, Paetzolt I, Grüßer L, Coburn M,
Rossaint R, Kowark A. Poor reporting quality
of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of
COVID-19 – a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC
Medical Research Methodology. 2022 Jan;22(1):23.