Data collection methods

Describe data collection methods and design in detail, and justify them in relation to the research question(s), paradigm, approach, and other methods.1 If data collection and analysis was iterative:

Identify the study period.

Describe important characteristics of the individuals conducting interviews, observations or focus groups, and methods used to train these individuals.

Justification and Examples

Why readers need this information

The study period helps readers place the study in temporal context and identify factors not mentioned by the authors that might affect findings, interpretation, and implications. (See Item 8 for ending data collection.)

Describing researcher characteristics clarifies the relationship between the individuals involved in data collection and the participants in the research and also explains what efforts were made to ensure consistency in the data collection process (See Items 6 and 15.)

Examples

Further, it was decided that group interviews, also known as focus group discussions would be the best means of data collection. This is a method of data collection that enables group members to feed off each other’s ideas and an effective moderator will maintain group focus whilst at the same time permitting flexibility in the direction those aspects of the discussion might take. [REF]

Adjustments to the interview protocol were made according to early experience and information participants had provided (i.e. redundant questions were eliminated; questions were reworded to improve flow and clarity; additional probes were included).

Faculty staff were then interviewed individually by a trained study investigator in a 15-minute, semi-structured interview. This sequence was repeated with other video encounters. Table 2 presents examples of interview questions. Each faculty member was interviewed by at least three interviewers over their various interviews. Interviewers were chosen based on their experience in interviewing. All were trained during a half-day meeting to interpret and deliver the interview guide in the same manner in order to elicit information of a consistent type.

Footnotes

  1. Researchers may choose to use information from multiple sources, contexts, and/or time points depending on their approach and research question(s). (See Item 11 for triangulation.)↩︎

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@misc{o'brien2023,
  author = {O’Brien, Bridget and Harris, Ilene and Beckman, Thomas and
    Reed, Darcy and Cook, David},
  title = {The {SRQR} Guidelines for Writing Qualitative Research
    Articles Version 1.1},
  version = {1.1},
  date = {},
  doi = {10.1234/equator/1010101},
  langid = {en}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
O’Brien, Bridget, Ilene Harris, Thomas Beckman, Darcy Reed, and David Cook. n.d. “The SRQR Guidelines for Writing Qualitative Research Articles Version 1.1.” The EQUATOR Network Guideline Dissemination Platform. https://doi.org/10.1234/equator/1010101.